<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why social media won&#8217;t but could win the election: #LEWISSMS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dannywhatmough.com/2010/03/10/why-social-media-wont-but-could-win-the-election-lewissms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dannywhatmough.com/2010/03/10/why-social-media-wont-but-could-win-the-election-lewissms/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 13:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Whatmough</title>
		<link>http://www.dannywhatmough.com/2010/03/10/why-social-media-wont-but-could-win-the-election-lewissms/comment-page-1/#comment-742</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Whatmough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dannywhatmough.com/?p=613#comment-742</guid>
		<description>Thanks - yes, agreed - you only have to look at the amount of tweeting during Question Time to know that this is true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks &#8211; yes, agreed &#8211; you only have to look at the amount of tweeting during Question Time to know that this is true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: General Election</title>
		<link>http://www.dannywhatmough.com/2010/03/10/why-social-media-wont-but-could-win-the-election-lewissms/comment-page-1/#comment-741</link>
		<dc:creator>General Election</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dannywhatmough.com/?p=613#comment-741</guid>
		<description>Great post Danny.  I was at the event too and although I really enjoyed it, it was flawed in all the ways you describe.  For me the key issue is how social media will combine with conventional and in particular the impact that twitter will have on the TV debates.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://generalelection.wordpress.com/2010/03/10/why-tom-watson-mp-is-only-half-right-or-half-wrong-on-tv/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://generalelection.wordpress.com/2010/03/10...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Danny.  I was at the event too and although I really enjoyed it, it was flawed in all the ways you describe.  For me the key issue is how social media will combine with conventional and in particular the impact that twitter will have on the TV debates.  <a href="http://generalelection.wordpress.com/2010/03/10/why-tom-watson-mp-is-only-half-right-or-half-wrong-on-tv/" rel="nofollow">http://generalelection.wordpress.com/2010/03/10&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why social media won&#39;t but could win the election: #LEWISSMS &#8230; &#124; Drakz Free Online Service</title>
		<link>http://www.dannywhatmough.com/2010/03/10/why-social-media-wont-but-could-win-the-election-lewissms/comment-page-1/#comment-743</link>
		<dc:creator>Why social media won&#39;t but could win the election: #LEWISSMS &#8230; &#124; Drakz Free Online Service</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dannywhatmough.com/?p=613#comment-743</guid>
		<description>[...] is the original post: Why social media won&#039;t but could win the election: #LEWISSMS &#8230;   Share and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is the original post: Why social media won&#39;t but could win the election: #LEWISSMS &#8230;   Share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Whatmough</title>
		<link>http://www.dannywhatmough.com/2010/03/10/why-social-media-wont-but-could-win-the-election-lewissms/comment-page-1/#comment-738</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Whatmough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 02:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dannywhatmough.com/?p=613#comment-738</guid>
		<description>Thanks Eoghan, all valid points.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yes, the billboard comment was probably a bit throwaway, but I think us new media types just get a bit angry when we see so much money thrown at mass media - do they get ROI?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I mainly agree with you about Facebook. I don&#039;t actually think Facebook is as &#039;difficult&#039; as many imagine but, as you say, the &#039;down your throat&#039;/mass media approach won&#039;t work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Eoghan, all valid points.</p>
<p>Yes, the billboard comment was probably a bit throwaway, but I think us new media types just get a bit angry when we see so much money thrown at mass media &#8211; do they get ROI?</p>
<p>I mainly agree with you about Facebook. I don&#39;t actually think Facebook is as &#39;difficult&#39; as many imagine but, as you say, the &#39;down your throat&#39;/mass media approach won&#39;t work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eoghan</title>
		<link>http://www.dannywhatmough.com/2010/03/10/why-social-media-wont-but-could-win-the-election-lewissms/comment-page-1/#comment-737</link>
		<dc:creator>Eoghan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 01:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dannywhatmough.com/?p=613#comment-737</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll be interested to see how politicians (and PR and marketing people more generally) start to integrate social media into integrated 360 campaigns. When the direct mail that drops through your letterbox and the party political broadcasts start to drive traffic to an official Facebook or Twitter which in turn point to YouTube channels and blogs, then we&#039;ll start to see some wheels really turning - I&#039;m not convinced this is happening properly yet as social media is seen too often as separate from the rest of a marketing campaign rather than being integrated properly.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It think it&#039;s possibly a little reactionary to say that &quot;billboard ads won&#039;t cut the mustard any more&quot;; as someone said to me last night &quot;your family living in a Rochdale council estate aren&#039;t likely to be looking at mydavidcameron&quot;. That said, every single one of the Tory campaigns since the new year, it seems to me, has been disastrous - coincidence with the slump in opinion polls? Hard to say.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree that Facebook is still the great unused weapon but its power can be limited. I&#039;d love to see some stats on this, but my impression is that the vast majority of people who join a Facebook group actually interact with it very rarely. At least with fan pages the content pops up in your news feed. Groups are dead in their present form. But the way it&#039;s structured, only a confirmed (say) Labour voter will click the button that says &quot;become a fan of The Labour Party&quot;; more subtle ways will be needed to interact with floating voters on Facebook.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nice bloggage on last night Danny, I&#039;ve linked to this article from one I wrote myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ll be interested to see how politicians (and PR and marketing people more generally) start to integrate social media into integrated 360 campaigns. When the direct mail that drops through your letterbox and the party political broadcasts start to drive traffic to an official Facebook or Twitter which in turn point to YouTube channels and blogs, then we&#39;ll start to see some wheels really turning &#8211; I&#39;m not convinced this is happening properly yet as social media is seen too often as separate from the rest of a marketing campaign rather than being integrated properly.</p>
<p>It think it&#39;s possibly a little reactionary to say that &#8220;billboard ads won&#39;t cut the mustard any more&#8221;; as someone said to me last night &#8220;your family living in a Rochdale council estate aren&#39;t likely to be looking at mydavidcameron&#8221;. That said, every single one of the Tory campaigns since the new year, it seems to me, has been disastrous &#8211; coincidence with the slump in opinion polls? Hard to say.</p>
<p>I agree that Facebook is still the great unused weapon but its power can be limited. I&#39;d love to see some stats on this, but my impression is that the vast majority of people who join a Facebook group actually interact with it very rarely. At least with fan pages the content pops up in your news feed. Groups are dead in their present form. But the way it&#39;s structured, only a confirmed (say) Labour voter will click the button that says &#8220;become a fan of The Labour Party&#8221;; more subtle ways will be needed to interact with floating voters on Facebook.</p>
<p>Nice bloggage on last night Danny, I&#39;ve linked to this article from one I wrote myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

