If you’re going to use social media, make sure you use it to be social!

As you may have picked up already today, we have released our second report investigating how some of the UK’s leading technology companies are using social media. You can download it here.

For the second year in a row, we found that UK technology companies are missing out on the potential of social media by not being social and failing to use these new channels to engage with their audiences.

Only 31% of brands with a Facebook account used it to engage with users and, of those that used Twitter, only 14% of tweets were replies and retweets. When it came to the companies that had a blog, only 20% received comments and only one company took the trouble to reply to comments received.

In the study, we took the 2010 Deloitte Fast Tech 50 – a list of the UK’s 50 fastest growing technology companies and benchmarked their social media activity.

Facebook for B2B is on the rise

One of the most interesting findings this year was that the use of Facebook amongst B2B companies has skyrocketed in the last 12 months with 70% of B2B companies on the platform compared to just 40% previously. Linkedin was still the most popular network used overall (92%), followed by Twitter (80%). YouTube remained the least popular for the second year running (44%). Despite the increase in adoption, most companies were still only using these channels for ‘push’ marketing techniques with 65% of companies with a Facebook page using it for one way communications and 96% of blogs simply broadcasting article and news content without inviting responses.

B2B v B2C

As might be expected, B2C brands in the study were far more likely to engage with users than B2B companies. Of the B2C companies with a Facebook page, 63% used it to engage with consumers compared to just 22% of B2B companies. And, while the percentage of B2B tweets that were replies was only 7%, B2C rated much higher (35%).

Tech companies were also still failing to effectively integrate social media channels with their website. Only 58% of companies in the study had social media links on their homepage despite over 90% of companies having at least one social media site. Half of companies linked Twitter from their homepage, but only 14% linked to a YouTube page or blog.

It’s no longer whether you use it, it’s how you use it

This matches what we’ve found in the last year when speaking to tech companies about social media PR. Whereas a few years ago much of the conversation was about whether tech brands should be using social media. These days, most companies know that they have to get in on the social media act, but are still unsure how to go about it. I predict we’ll see further maturing over the next year, so when version three of the report comes along, maybe we’ll finally see companies using social to be social.

Download ‘How social are you?

Originally posted here.

Will integration save Linkedin?

I was at a PRCA event last week run by Cristina Hoole, European PR and Marketing manager at Linkedin.

The problem with Linkedin

I’ve always been a bit confused by Linkedin. I can see the potential benefits, but just can’t bring myself to make it a major part of my everyday working life. My profile is kept updated. I often add new contacts. And I’ll use it to look people up. But I just don’t use the site on a regular basis.

Having said that, Linkedin isn’t failing – Hoole reported 50 million users worldwide and 3 million here in the UK – but I wonder how many of these actually visit the site every single day, as they would with Twitter or Facebook?

Linkedin is great for linking together your business community, but it doesn’t have that everyday application that other networks have. This is potentially a problem: two of three of its revenue sources – advertising and premium accounts – are mainly focused ‘on-site’ (the third being software packages for recruitment agents).

Linkedin Outlook Integration

But Cristina revealed an interesting new feature for Linkedin – Outlook Integration. And it makes total sense.

Where do most ‘business people’ spend most of their time? In Outlook.

Outlook integration therefore seems like a great idea. I now don’t need to visit the Linkedin site every single day, but I can still harness the usefulness of the tool through Outlook – something I use for long stretches of time every single day. Obviously monetising this will be a challenge, but at least it could begin to make Linkedin an everyday, business critical tool.

Twitter has had unbelievable success with third party applications and increasingly Facebook is entering and finding traction here. As we start using more and more networks, bringing together more and more friends and followers, these third party apps are crucial to helping us keep on top of everything.

And I think this could be the key to future success for Linkedin too.

Footnote…

I actually wrote most of this post last week, but only got round to finishing now. And, by sheer coincidence, Linkedin has today announced a brand new API for third party developers. Tweetdeck is reportedly releasing an integration later this week.

Could there possibly be ray of sunshine round the corner for Linkedin?

picture credit

The problem with FriendFeed

Ah FriendFeed. Loved by Scoble, ignored by many in favour of its leaner, easier, prettier social-media-cousin Twitter.

I can’t help thinking it’s just slightly ahead of its time.

Twitter itself took a while to go mainstream, despite its simplicity, but I fear it will take a while for FriendFeed to reach the same heights.

Interest has peaked again in some circles recently with the redesign (a big improvement cosmetically) and the ability to add subcriptions based on your Twitter followers. But its problems lie deeper. And they aren’t solely to do with the service itself.

FriendFeed is a great concept. A one-stop-shop for all your social mediaryness. Fed up of keeping track of your delicious feed, Twitter and Facebook accounts, Linkedin profile, Flickr friends etc.? FriendFeed solves that by combining everything into one place.

Trouble is, for me, at the moment 90% of updates on FriendFeed are from Twitter.

And that just makes me think, why don’t I just use Twitter (or Seesmic Desktop – my agent of choice).

Maybe the problem is that we aren’t really social enough yet. Is the pain point really there yet?

If I feel like checking some interesting links, I go to Delicious (although Twitter is actually dimisihing my use of Delicious…but that’s for another post). Friend updates? I’m off to Facebook. Linkedin for professional contact information, Flickr for photos… The list goes on.

As soon as I try to put everything in one place, I get information overload. And I’ve yet to really get my head around sorting my ‘friends’ into groups on FriendFeed.

Jeremiah Owyang speaks of the future when we will have social elements everywhere. Just thinking about this gives me a bit of a headache to be honest, but maybe then there will be a greater need for some sort of ‘social dashboard’ and maybe FF will fill the gap.

Until then, I’ll keep an eye on it, but I don’t think I’ll become a 24/7 convert anytime soon. Or am I just not doing it properly? (You can subscribe to me on FF here!)

picture credit

About

This is my story. I've always been fascinated by the internet. My first passion was music and I studied a music degree at Birmingham University. But once graduated I quickly went back to the web working as a digital marketer. I also ran a web startup for a few years. In the need of a new challenge, I turned to the world of PR and now work as an Account Director at EML Wildfire. My interest is primarily looking at how PR professionals can make the most of the web and digital marketing. This blog contains my thoughts and things I find inspirational.

© 2012 Danny Whatmough - Made by me